GRIFFIN vs PACT/COA

 

 

 

 

 

The information on these webpages are public record, have been filed in open court.

This is simply the facts of the case and all documents that have been filed in state and federalc the party'ourt.

AS of 02-08-2010 This website will be updated as often as possible.

 

 

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS GARRY WILKISON, LINDA LITOWSKY, CATHY BEAUDOIN, JACKIE GOODMAN,

CELIA HUGHES,EMANUEL LIMUEL, JR, OSCAR PALOMO, DANIEL SCARDINO, DEBORAH L. HILL, HELENE CAUDILL AND

PUBLIC ACCESS COMMUNITY TELEVISION'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DEFENDANTS' PLEA TO THE JURISDICTION,

AND ALTERNATIVELY, SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS AND MOTION FOR SANCTION

 

 

 

LETTER TO DISTRICT ATTORNEYOF TRAVIS COUNTY

DEFENDANTS CITY OF AUSTIN AND RONDELLA HAWKINS'
PLEA TO THE JURISDICTION, MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND, ALTERNATIVELY, SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS

NOTICE OF HEARING 12/15/09

 

 

 

List of people letters out

subpoenas were sent to.

Calendar of events
Questions to be asked of Time Warner
     
 

POLITICAL SUBDIVISION LIABILITY
UNDER THE TEXAS TORT CLAIMS ACT

Filing Status changes to
"Confirmation".

 

 

 

   

 

LINDA LITOWSKY'S RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE

HELENE CAUDILL'S ANSWERS AND

OBJECTIONS TO
PLAINTIFF'S INTERROGATORIES

HELENE CAUDILL'S RESPONSES TO

REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE

DEFENDANT RONDELLA HAWKINS' RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S DISCOVERY
LINDA LITOWSKY'S ANSWERS AND OBJECTIONS TO
PLAINTIFF'S INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT

Motion for interpreter,

filed on August 14, 2009

DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR

DISCLOSURE TO
PLAINTIFF DAVID P. GRIFFIN

DEFENDANT RONDELLA HAWKINS' RESPONSES
TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST

FOR DISCLOSURE

DEFENDANT CELIA HUGHES' ORIGINAL ANSWER
TO PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION
DEFENDANT LINDA LITOWSKY'S ORIGINAL ANSWER
TO PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION

CAUSE NO. D-1-GN-09-002028

PLAINTIFF’vSORIGINAL PETITION

DEFENDANT CITY OF AUSTIN'S RESPONSES
TO PLAINTIFF'S REOUEST

FOR DISCLOSURE

DEFENDANT EMANUEL LIMUEL'S ORIGINAL ANSWER
TO PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION

DEFENDANT DEBORAH L. HILL'S ORIGINAL ANSWER
TO PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION

TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
PART II - RULES OF PRACTICE IN

DISTRICT AND COUNTY COURTS

DEFENDANT CITY OF AUSTIN'S RESPONSE
TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR INTERROGATORIES

 

David P. Griffin

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT PUBLIC ACCESS COMMUNITY TELEVISION

PLUNKETT & GIBSON, INC.
JOHN A. HELLER State Bar No. 09394600
Renaissance Plaza, Suite 1100 70 N.E. Loop 410
San Antonio, Texas 78216-5893

Telephone: (210) 734-7092 Facsimile: (210) 734-0379

Clark Richards
816 Congress Ave., Suite 1200 Austin, TX 78701

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT CITY OF AUSTIN,

Robin Sanders Assistant City Attorney
State Bar No. 09310900 City of Austin-Law Department
P. O. Box 1546 Austin, Texas 78767 -1546
(512) 974-2429 (512) 974-6490 [FAX]

The federal lawsuit

 

FINAL JUDGMENT

CAUSE NO. A-09-CV -107 -LY

Dear, Detective Matt Coney
I hope things are going well for you
.
FEDERAL RULES
OF
CIVIL PROCEDURE
David P. Griffin
POR-SE
Austin, Texas
Clarification on open records request
Wednesday, October 22, 2008

City of Austin on Mute

March 27, 2009

Contract for Management of Austin's

Three Public Access Television Channels,

Facilities and Programming

DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S

MOTIONS AND REPL Y TO
PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS'

ADVISORY

Celia M. Hughes Friday, September 19, 2008
VSA arts of Texas
3710 Cedar Street #7 Austin, Texas 78705

DEFENDANTS' ADVISORY TO THE COURT

this 22nd day of May 2009

CAUSE NO. A-09-CV-107-LY

Dyslexia - Willie,

the free encyclopedia

CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE
TITLE 5. GOVERNMENTAL LIABILITY
CHAPTER 101. TORT CLAIMS

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT CAUSE

NO. D-1-GN-09-000069

A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE TO FILING A CIVIL LAWSUIT
Guidelines for Litigants without Lawyers
Southern District of Texas
PLAINTIFF’S REPLY TO DEFENDANTS PUBLIC ACCESS COMMUNITY TELEVISION,
CATHY BEAUDOIN, JACKIE GOODMAN, CELIA HUGHES, EMANUEL LIMUEL, DANIEL
SCARDINO AND DEBORAH HILL’S RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

 

March 18 2009
CAUSE NO. A-09-CV -107 -LY
March 18 2009 2
CAUSE NO. A-09-CV -107 -LY
March 24 2009
CAUSE NO. A-09-CV -107 -LY
March 30 2009
CAUSE NO. A-09-CV -107 -LY
March 16,2009
CAUSE NO. A-09-CV -107 -LY
March 18,2009
CAUSE NO. A-09-CV -107 -LY
March 23,2009
CAUSE NO. A-09-CV -107 -LY
10-21-08
CAUSE NO. A-09-CV -107 -LY
10-22-08
CAUSE NO. A-09-CV -107 -LY
Plaintiff's Motion For Interpreter
All Dismissal
CAUSE NO. A-09-CV -107 -LY
 
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL
CAUSE NO. A-09-CV -107 -LY
MOTION FOR INTERRUPTER
CAUSE NO. A-09-CV -107 -LY

 

This computer chip is city property I purchased it from pack and question the purchase of city property

.

 

 

 

Thank you for your interests.

 

Please download either a Word document for PDF file.

all_david_Vs_PACT1.pdf 47.5 MB

Please visit youtube.com and leave comments on videos

I will be happy to mail a hard copy or CD/DVD.

 

 

   

 

 

   

11-7-09